Using the Curtis Richmond litigation blueprint, two new motions to intervene have been filed in the AdSurfDaily forfeiture case.
The motions were filed by Ronald Breckenfelder of Littleton, Colo., and John R. Moore of Ames, Iowa. The motions accuse U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer, U.S. Attorney Jeffrey A Taylor, and Assistant U.S. Attorney William Cowden of committing crimes.
In addition, the motions accuse the judge, the prosecutors and Chief Judge Royce Lamberth of conspiring to deny ASD members justice. Collyer and Lamberth specifically were accused of operating a “Kangaroo Court.”
As was the case in two previous motions to intervene, including a motion filed by Richmond himself, Collyer placed a hand-written note on the cover pages of the motions.
“Let this be filed,” she wrote. Collyer has used the exact same wording on each of four motions to intervene filed in the ASD case in recent weeks.
The documents order Collyer to set aside the ASD forfeiture within 30 days or face criminal or civil prosecution.Â At the same time, court documents filed with the motions include a list of demands made on prosecutors and Agent Roy Dotson of the U.S. Secret Service to produce “Legal Evidence” within seven days or face legal action.
Richmond is associated with a sham Utah Indian tribe that has been successfully sued under racketeering statutes for bringing vexatious legal proceedings against judges, prosecutors and police officers. He also has been convicted of contempt of court for threatening federal judges.
The tribe is known derisively as the “Arby’s Indians” because it once held a meeting in an Arby’s restaurant in Provo, Utah. A sham “Supreme Court” set up by the tribe used the address of a conference room attached to a doughnut shop in Utah as its chambers.
One prong of the “Indian” strategy is to place enormous judgments against public officials in a bid to extort a litigation result. Recent motions in the ASD case that have used the Richmond blueprint have said an ASD member by the name of Alana Holsted has been prevented from collecting on a $30 million judgment because of conspiratorial actions by the judge and prosecutors.
The Holstead claim appears to seek a total of $120 million in judgments for the alleged offenses of Interference With Commerce and Interference With Interstate Commerce.